Results on Friday, 21st of January (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- Numbers 36, 43 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
- All numbers in the results on 2000-01-21 are higher or equal to those in the previous results.
- Except for 2 (32, 36), all are odd numbers: (33, 37, 43, 45)
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 6 (37 to 43) while the smallest distance is 1 (due to the consecutive numbers)
- Look how close to each other these 4 numbers have been: 32, 33, 36, 37. Only 5 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 3
- Notice that there are 2 sets of two consecutive numbers in this draw.
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are mixed.
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2000-01-21
Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Sum of numbers | 226 | ↑ | 29.89% |
Sum of digits | 46 | ↑ | 53.33% |
Numbers range | 13 | ↓ | -60.61% |
Evens | 2 | ⟳ | |
Odds | 4 | ⟳ | |
Repeating Decades | 4+2 | ↑ | 2 |
Repeating last digits | 2 | ⟳ | |
Hot number | 21 | not drawn | |
Cold number | 6 | not drawn | |
Repeating numbers | 43 | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply