Results on Thursday, 26th of September (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are all down compared to the previous ones.
- Except for 2 (9, 15), all are even numbers: (6, 12, 18, 20)
- 5 of the 6 numbers were evenly distributed. Take a look:
6, +3= 9, +3= 12, +3= 15, +3= 18, 20 - The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 3 (6 to 9) while the smallest distance is 2 (18 to 20)
- Numbers 9, 15 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
- Look how close to each other these 3 numbers have been: 12, 15, 18. Only 6 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 1
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2002-09-26
| Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of numbers | 80 | ↓ | -33.88% |
| Sum of digits | 35 | ↓ | -12.5% |
| Numbers range | 14 | ↓ | -65% |
| Evens | 4 | ↓ | -1 |
| Odds | 2 | ↑ | 1 |
| Repeating Decades | 2+3 | ↑ | 1 |
| Repeating last digits | 1 | ↓ | -1 |
| Hot number | 47 | not drawn | |
| Cold number | 49 | not drawn | |
| Repeating numbers | 9 | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here, and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply