Results on Thursday, 23rd of October (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- Numbers 33 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
- Look how close to each other these 3 numbers have been: 41, 42, 43. Only 2 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 4
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are mixed.
- Notice that there are 1 sets of three consecutive numbers in this draw. Now that's not an every day event!
- Except for 2 (24, 42), all are odd numbers: (21, 33, 41, 43)
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 9 (24 to 33) while the smallest distance is 1 (due to the consecutive numbers)
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2008-10-23
| Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of numbers | 204 | ↑ | 12.09% |
| Sum of digits | 33 | ↓ | -29.79% |
| Numbers range | 22 | ↓ | -45% |
| Evens | 2 | ↓ | -2 |
| Odds | 4 | ↑ | 2 |
| Repeating Decades | 2+3 | ↑ | 1 |
| Repeating last digits | 2+2 | ⟳ | |
| Hot number | 23 | not drawn | |
| Cold number | 4 | not drawn | |
| Repeating numbers | N/A | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply