Results on Friday, 26th of May (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
2+1 numbers 1 ticket
Notable in these results
- Although the first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are mixed, they were one hair away from being the same.
- Numbers 17, 24 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
- Look how close to each other these 3 numbers have been: 30, 31, 39. Only 9 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 3
- All numbers in the results on 2017-05-26 are higher or equal to those in the previous results.
- Notice that there are 2 sets of two consecutive numbers in this draw.
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 8 (31 to 39) while the smallest distance is 1 (due to the consecutive numbers)
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2017-05-26
Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Sum of numbers | 181 | ↑ | 120.73% |
Sum of digits | 37 | ⟳ | % |
Numbers range | 23 | ⟳ | % |
Evens | 3 | ↓ | -1 |
Odds | 3 | ↑ | 1 |
Repeating Decades | 3 | ⟳ | |
Repeating last digits | 2 | ⟳ | |
Hot number | 12 | not drawn | |
Cold number | 46 | not drawn | |
Repeating numbers | N/A | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply