Results on Friday, 18th of September (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
5 numbers 1 ticket
Notable in these results
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are all up compared to the previous ones.
- Except for 2 (17, 49), all are even numbers: (6, 36, 42, 46)
- Take a look at: 6, 36, 46. Note how they all have the same last digit, which is 6
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 19 (17 to 36) while the smallest distance is 3 (46 to 49)
- Look how close to each other these 3 numbers have been: 42, 46, 49. Only 7 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 4
- Numbers 46, 11 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2020-09-18
| Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of numbers | 196 | ↑ | 24.84% |
| Sum of digits | 52 | ↑ | 30% |
| Numbers range | 43 | ↑ | 22.86% |
| Evens | 4 | ↑ | 1 |
| Odds | 2 | ↓ | -1 |
| Repeating Decades | 3 | ↑ | 1 |
| Repeating last digits | 3 | ↑ | 1 |
| Hot number | 6 | drawn | |
| Cold number | 7 | not drawn | |
| Repeating numbers | 46 | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply