Results on Friday, 26th of February (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- All numbers in the results on 2021-02-26 are lower or equal to those in the previous results.
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 12 (15 to 27) while the smallest distance is 6 (9 to 15)
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are all down compared to the previous ones.
- Except for 2 (2, 38), all are odd numbers: (9, 15, 27, 45)
- Numbers 2, 38, 45, 49 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2021-02-26
Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Sum of numbers | 136 | ↓ | -32% |
Sum of digits | 46 | ↓ | -17.86% |
Numbers range | 43 | ↓ | -6.52% |
Evens | 2 | ⟳ | |
Odds | 4 | ⟳ | |
Repeating Decades | 2 | ↓ | -1 |
Repeating last digits | 2 | ⟳ | |
Hot number | 17 | not drawn | |
Cold number | 10 | not drawn | |
Repeating numbers | 45 | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
💬For first subscriber do I need a pay version b4 i can open my account or I can subscribe for a premium later on ?Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-12 15:28 GMTNot sure what your question is. Could you please be more specific?
Thanks.
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here, and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply